"ne jotka ovat tilanneet special editionin niin paljonko olette maksaneet?"

Maksoin siitä noin 50 jöröä postikuluineen. Vähän kirpaiseen, mutta kerran vaan:)

"Tässäpä ne tärkeimmät!

IGN
92/100
Cole’s powers are cool, the graphic novel cutscenes are stunning, the story is intriguing, and the city is alive.

GameTrailers
90/100
Thanks to its fluid, genre-crossing gameplay and action-packed scenarios, inFAMOUS has established itself as an electrifying new addition to the PS3 library.

GameSpot
90/100
Incredible freedom of movement, intense combat, and an enthralling story make Infamous an impressive open-world action game.

1UP
91/100
Simply put, InFamous is the kind of game that when I’m not playing it, I’m constantly thinking about doing so. Heck, I already know what’s going to happen right after I finish this sentence: I’m going to go back and play more as ”superhero lightning cop” Cole."

Niimpä, ja muita ei tarvitse lahjoakaan.

Invamouse ei kiinnosta

”Tässäpä ne tärkeimmät!"

Eurogamer tuntuu olevan niiden harvojen joukossa, jotka arvioivat pelit nykyään järki päässä. Sen verran on muuttunut tärkeäksi pelitalojen tuki näille saiteille. Money talks ja kaikki nuo ovat pelitalojen kanssa nykyään yhtä suurta perhettä.

"koska hauska juttu on se että ps2 myy enemmän kuin ps3"

Ei todellakaan myy.

"Sen verran on muuttunut tärkeäksi pelitalojen tuki näille saiteille. Money talks ja kaikki nuo ovat pelitalojen kanssa nykyään yhtä suurta perhettä."

Ei helvetti miten naurettavia juttuja täällä! Varsinkin PS3 pelien kohdalla näitä jauhetaan aina. Kyseisellä konsolillahan ei voi olla oikeasti hyviä pelejä vaan kaikki vähänkään paremmat arvosanat ja arvostelut on tietysti maksettuja. Menkää hoitoon!

"Eurogamer tuntuu olevan niiden harvojen joukossa, jotka arvioivat pelit nykyään järki päässä."

Et voi olla tosissasi!

Developer and gamers claim reviewer did not even play the game

Controversy befalls Eurogamer's Darkfall Online review

If you have read Eurogamer scathing review of Darkfall Online, an MMO by Adventurine, then you'd understand why the developers got so flustered.

The game scored a 2 / 10, but Adventurine and Darkfall fans are not letting this one go. The review has already accumulated 623 comments since it was posted yesterday (gunning for 700 by this evening), many from angry gamers who played Darkfall or are familiar with the title, claiming the reviewer didn't actually play.

And as well all know, Hell hath no fury like a bunch of really pissed off gamers.

A Darkfall developer, known as "Tasos" on the forums, posted about the review as well, pointing out why Adventurine believes Eurogamer's score is completely unfounded. He states that the website did personally warn him ahead of time about the low score, but something just didn't sit well with the studio:

When we read the hostile review by Ed Zitron, one thing became apparent: he had not played the game at all. Eurogamer readers and Darkfall players are posting bullet lists of factual errors in the story. The reviewer hadn't even figured out the very basics of the game before he wrote about it. We checked the logs for the 2 accounts we gave Eurogamer and we found that one of them had around 3 minutes playtime, and the other had less than 2 hours spread out in 13 sessions. Most of these 2 hours were spent in the character creator since during almost every one of the logins the reviewer spent the time creating a new character. The rest of the time was apparently spent taking the low-res screenshots that accompanied the article. At no point did this reviewer spend more than a few minutes online at a time.

Darkfall is the largest MMORPG game of its kind and this guy spent a few minutes playing(?) before he tore it apart. How can someone do that responsibly? Ed Zitron didn’t even give Darkfall a chance.

http://www.neoseeker.com/news/10659-controversy-befalls-eurogamers-darkfall-online-review

http://www.rewiredmind.com/gaming-articles/eurogamer-scandal

Tuohon eurogameria koskevaan artikkeliin on laitettu tuo itkevä penikka osuvasti. Sillä kai halutaan osoittaa asian painoarvoa. Kyseessä on näemmä tapaus jossa yksittäinen arvioija on arvioinut täysin paskan pelin liian lyhyellä testaamisella. No, itse pystyn antamaan aika hyvän arvion kahden tunnin persteella, mutta se ei olisi reilua pelintakijää kohtaan. Tuskin tämä mestariteos onkaan kahta pojoa parempi, vaikka olisi pelattu koko vuosi. Onneksi kyseessä ei ollut raha kuitenkaan Eurogameri tapauksessa, kun taas noiden muiden isojen saittien motiivina on aina raha.

Jep jep. Esim. Eurogamer Portugal antoi Infamousille 9/10 ja Brittien biased Eurolamer 7/10.